Tag Archives: Thomm Quackenbush

Book Review of Thomm Quackenbush’s We Shadows

We ShadowsAuthor, Thomm Quackenbush, sent me a copy of his novel We Shadows.

Description from Goodreads:
After a year of coasting rather than living, destroyed by her boyfriend Eliot’s death, Shane Valentine matriculates into his college. She begins to build a new life as a college freshman, only to have it stolen from her one night, when she is trying to drown her sorrows at the bottom of a daiquiri.

She wakes the next day in a strange apartment with three scars she can’t remember and a bloody shirt. On her walk of shame in stolen clothes, she realizes that no one aside for her roommate Roselyn, a Wiccan with epilepsy, remembers her. Unfortunately three occultists are after her to fix the mistake they made and they remember her too well.

Gideon, a daemonic being with an penchant for card, finds her and assures her he is going to help her out of his own sense of self-preservation. After a quick trip to the nameless campus drug dealer, whose abilities far exceed the selling of narcotics, Shane begins on an adventure to figure out what was done with her and why, to regain a life she had been wasting in mourning. Then, she begins to see Eliot’s ghosts and realizes even chaos cannot be so cut and dry.

Review:
I have to be honest. I only kinda, sorta, maybe understand what just happened at the end of this book. It feels like things wrapped up, but I don’t actually know what happened. Did she? Didn’t she? Was she? Wasn’t she? Will she? Won’t she? (Ok, now I just sound a bit like Girl.) At best it’s a loose conclusion, though it does conclude. Having said all of that, I quite enjoyed the ride. Quackenbush has developed some really interesting characters in this book. Some I know are poached from various mythologies, but they are all artfully integrated to create an engaging story.

The whole thing just felt a little shallow though. I don’t necessarily mean that as a harsh criticism. The characters had enough depth, there weren’t too many deep plot holes and dialogue flowed well, but for all of the philosophy spouted, decisions made and actions taken very little deep explanation was ever given. It all led to a feeling of gloss…like looking at a water colour where you can clearly see what the picture is despite the fact that the lines are all indistinct and often wobbly. As a result I regularly “only kinda, sorta, maybe understand what just happened.”

Then there was Girl. She’s was very Mad Hatter-like, speaking in enlightened gibberish and riddles…and just in case you don’t immediately note the similarity she liked to quote Carroll and have random tea-parties too. Actually, now that I think about it, I kind of wish I had paid more attention throughout the book. I’d bet there are more than a few Alice in Wonderland references I didn’t catch. Gideon’s penchant for cards could be one. Hookas and ‘who are you’ type conversations abound. Yes, I’ve decided. There is a definite Alice in Wonderland feel to this book. Shane has lost her sense of self, just like little Alice.

Quackenbush is a talented writer, without doubt. The dry, witty humour was worth reading the book for on its own. Shane, for example, very much reminded me of Rory from Gilmore Girls, though there isn’t any real reason for me to make that comparison since the genre’s are so very different. But there just aren’t a lot of characters that could make grammar jokes funny, probably not many authors either.