Monthly Archives: April 2016

Book Review of Child of the Sun 1 & 2

I’ve got something a little different today. Michael Van Cleve, the author of the comic book Child of the Sun (along with illustrators  Renee Reeser, Jon Bass and Adam Rosenlund ) sent me the first two volumes for review. I went into this with such high hopes.

Child of the Sun, 1 Child of the Sun, 2

Description from Goodreads:
Child of the Sun is a very loose adaptation of the biblical Samson mixed with some other biblical tales, biblical legends, and ancient biblical fiction. The story focuses on the first half of Samson’s life: before Delilah, before the fall, when his power and confidence was at its height. It is also a love story between Samson and the little known wife of his youth.

Review:
I’m going to start by saying the art is pretty good. There are some flashy color panels and I like the illustrations in general. But much of my praise ends there. Largely because I’m obviously not the target audience.

I totally get that comics are traditionally a boys club. And I completely understand that it’s based on Biblical and mythological tales that are very androcentric in general. But nothing in that disallows the author & illustrators from breaking out of the well-worn and ill-thought females are nothing more than walking fleshlites or inconveniences to ‘bog’ a man down rut and including even one that wasn’t just there to be oogled or ‘taken.’ Outside of the focus on hard drinking and whoring there is basically only graphic violence here.

Again, I get it, comics ‘are for boys’ and I guess you write/draw for your market, right?  I have to question what inspired anyone to send this particular comic to a female reader, a fairly vocal feminist reviewer at that. Because as a woman, there was NOTHING in this to appeal to me. I don’t think there was meant to be, unless someone really missed their mark. In fact, it pretty much just pissed me off. The second even worse than the first, as it’s just basically borderline porn involving a truly miserable woman, a gang rape, an attempted rape and a carousal whore house.

So, if you’re a 16-year-old boy who revels in imagining that the paragon of manliness is puffed up, muscle bound, hard drinking, violence and ancient Greek era sex-bots go ahead and buy this. If you’re a girl, or God forbid the parent of a girl, run away. Quickly. Because, being as this is based on Hercules and Sampson (and we all know what happened to Sampson when he trusted a woman) I can only imagine the  denigration and villainization of women is going to get worse. Maybe I’m wrong. I hope I’m wrong. But I’m not sticking around to find out.

 

Wake of Vultures

Book Review of Wake of Vultures (The Shadow #1), by Lila Bowen

Wake of VulturesI borrowed a copy of Lila Bowen‘s Wake of Vultures from my local library.

Description from Goodreads:

Nettie Lonesome lives in a land of hard people and hard ground dusted with sand. She’s a half-breed who dresses like a boy, raised by folks who don’t call her a slave but use her like one. She knows of nothing else. That is, until the day a stranger attacks her. When nothing, not even a sickle to the eye can stop him, Nettie stabs him through the heart with a chunk of wood, and he turns into black sand.

And just like that, Nettie can see.

But her newfound sight is a blessing and a curse. Even if she doesn’t understand what’s under her own skin, she can sense what everyone else is hiding — at least physically. The world is full of evil, and now she knows the source of all the sand in the desert. Haunted by the spirits, Nettie has no choice but to set out on a quest that might lead to her true kin… if the monsters along the way don’t kill her first.

Review:

I found this quite enjoyable. The main character is a gender-fluid, probably bi-sexual of 16 and I liked her a lot. She was uneducated, but (with one exception which I’ll discuss) never stupid. I liked the world and the magic system. I liked the side characters and the conversational writing. For the most part I really enjoyed this.

I do have three criticisms though. The first is simply that it dragged in the middle. The second, is in and around Nettie’s discovering her gender and sexual identity, the book fell into didacticism. Perhaps being YA the author felt younger readers might need education, but as an adult I just wanted to move on.

The last complaint is a bit of a feminist rant on female sexuality. Throughout the book Nettie reiterated repeatedly that she wasn’t just a girl, she wanted to be treated as a man (though she never fully dismissed femaleness in her head). Part of this was simply an attempt to protect herself in a world where women are at risk simply by existing as woman, but some was honest gender fluidity. She also repeated that she’d managed not to be raped, which given her exceedingly unprotected status was fairly amazing.

However, there came a single instance in which she had to disclose and discuss having a female body with another. A couple people had seen through her disguise previously, but there was no need to negotiate acceptance with them. With the circumstance I’m referring to she had to convince another character that he should accept her even though he’s discovered she is a physically female, but still keep treating her as a male. In doing so she established her male persona fairly firmly.

The very next thing she did, however, was decide to use her femaleness and sex as a commodity to be bargained with, almost getting herself raped in the process and forcing the reader through a lengthy fear-of-violent-rape scene. This was abrupt and out of character, considering how hard she’d worked to never let it show.

But more importantly, in a book that had until that point treated Nettie as something more than her vagina (and focused on this heavily) it felt very much like a betrayal to suddenly turn around and do just that. And even if someone wanted to try and use the rape-was-a-reality-of-the-time-that-should-be-acknowledged-and-included argument, which is one I hate as rape is so much more prevalent in woman’s fiction than in the real world, the book started with an attempted rape of Nettie. So, that particular necessity had already been accomplished. To a large extent I lost a significant chunk of respect for the book in this one protracted scene. It so cripplingly undermined the very theme and impact the book was striving for.

Anyhow, I had three complaints, the last of which was a doozy for me. But for the most part I really enjoyed it and will be looking for more of Bowen’s work.

Stumptown Spirits

Book Review of Stumptown Spirits, by E.J. Russell

Stumptown SpiritsI received a copy of Stumptown Spirits, b E. J. Russell, from Netgalley.

Description from Goodreads:
What price would you pay to rescue a friend from hell?

For Logan Conner, the answer is almost anything. Guilt-ridden over trapping his college roommate in a ghost war rooted in Portland’s pioneer past, Logan has spent years searching for a solution. Then his new boyfriend, folklorist Riley Morrel, inadvertently gives him the key. Determined to pay his debt—and keep Riley safe—Logan abandons Riley and returns to Portland, prepared to give up his freedom and his future to make things right.

Crushed by Logan’s betrayal, Riley drops out of school and takes a job on a lackluster paranormal investigation show. When the crew arrives in Portland to film an episode about a local legend of feuding ghosts, he stumbles across Logan working at a local bar, and learns the truth about Logan’s plan.

Their destinies once more intertwined, the two men attempt to reforge their relationship while dodging a narcissistic TV personality, a craven ex-ghost, and a curmudgeonly bar owner with a hidden agenda. But Logan’s date with destiny is looming, and his life might not be the only one at stake. 

Review:
I have to admit that, while I didn’t dislike this, it wasn’t a big winner for me either. As much as I liked Riley and Logan (and I did), as interesting as I found the mystery (and it was), as amusing as I found the side characters (and they were), as often as I laughed (and I did ) I thought this was inelegantly written and at times just too over the top.

I completely understood that the characters were meant to be conflicted, wanting one thing but trying to do another, but the constant back and forwards annoyed me and it felt clunkily done. Logan’s internal dialogue was not enough to pull it off for me. What’s more, it all came down to an unwillingness to communicate that I found frustrating.

There was also one last twist toward the end that I thought way too coincidental and unbelievable. I don’t even think it contributed to the plot. The last event it prompted to action could have still happened without it.

All-in-all, I had complaints that kept me from loving it, but I did enjoy it. There is plenty of room between a book being a favorite and not liking a book at all. Riley was especially likable.