Onyx Webb

Book Review of Onyx Webb (Book 1), by Richard Fenton & Andrea Waltz

Onyx WebbAuthor, Andrea Waltz sent me, not only a copy of her and Richard Fenton’s book, but a whole ‘blogger kit.’ This was a novel way to promote their book. Having just written a ranty post about some authors putting no effort into a request, I was honestly impressed to find the other end of the spectrum.

Onyx Webb blogger kit

The coffee much shows they’ve paid particular care to the tendency of book bloggers. I may not know them all, but I know very few who don’t regularly post pictures of books and hot beverages. They just go so well together. See, I even used mine (cinnamon tea, if you’re curious).

See, I even used mine

I do have to address the obvious (or maybe not so obvious), since my husband’s laughing response to my daughter when she asked why someone sent me a packages with candy in it (the rock candy was the only item in the box she cared about) was, “Someone sent her a bribe.”

I’m laughing too, but it’s a legitimate comment. So for the record, I sat down to read the book with the intention of pulling no punches, of being as honest about my opinion of it as I am with any other book, free coffee mug or not. However, I will openly admit that seeing how much effort they put into promoting it, I did feel obligated to ensure it sat at the top of my review pile.

What’s the book about:
– It’s June, 1980 and piano prodigy, Juniper Cole is on the way to her senior prom.

– It’s January 2010, and Koda Mulvaney has blown through his 20 million dollar trust fund and is told by his father to return home and get to work.

– It’s August, 1904 and little Onyx Webb is on her way to the famous World’s Fair in St. Louis with her father, Catfish.

Two of the three will see a ghost, one will become a ghost and everyone will learn that life is hard to let go of even when you’re dead. And that’s just Book One. Designed to read like a supernatural soap opera, Onyx Webb is a paranormal suspense series, with supernatural romance, as well as a dash of historical fiction. The stories may haunt you, the darkness may disturb you, but ultimately you’ll be reminded to treasure every moment of your life because… If you think life is precious now? Just wait until you’re dead.

What did I think:
If you could see me, I’d be holding my hand up and rocking it back and forwards in a see-saw movement meaning, so-so. I thought the writing was simplistic, but good. The characters had distinct voices. The editing was clean. The idea was interesting and the authors balanced an impressive numbers of threads that look to be weaving together eventually. An impressive feet when you’re covering over 100 years.

However, we’re all individual readers and we all have literary qualities we do and don’t like. For me two things I’m not hugely fond of is vignettes and leaping back and forwards in time. Unfortunately, that is exactly what this book is. It’s set up so that you follow three primary character arcs in three different eras. What’s more, we were given very brief snippets, sometimes only a page or two for each one before leaping briefly to another and so on.

I can see what the authors were going for with this narrative choice. It was like getting little tastes of something larger. But, for me, it resulted in not being able to sink into the story, as I was always yanked back out with the changing focus.

Similarly, I’m not sure I followed the need for this to be written in episodes. (Unless it was originally written as a serial or something.) The overall impression I was given—from the too-brief chunks of character POVs, having the story broken into episodes and the unusually large number of new, or previously unimportant, characters being introduced late in the book—was that of disconnection. Like these are all puzzle pieces, but they’re all still in the box, yet to be put together.

I did think a few of the characters were a little heavy on their character’s characteristic. They were almost caricatures of their type of person—the rich playboy who doesn’t know the value of money, the cajun bayou man, etc. And I have to admit I thought the pictures felt a little gimmicky.

Lastly, for those to whom such things matter, there does seem to be a religious, or at least spiritual, theme being established in the storyline.

All in all, an interesting read that I think will appeal to the right reader.

Book Review: The Princess Bride, by William Goldman

the princess bride

As Florin and Guilder teeter on the verge of war, the reluctant Princess Buttercup is devastated by the loss of her true love, kidnapped by a mercenary and his henchman, rescued by a pirate, forced to marry Prince Humperdinck, and rescued once again by the very crew who absconded with her in the first place. In the course of this dazzling adventure, she’ll meet Vizzini—the criminal philosopher who’ll do anything for a bag of gold; Fezzik—the gentle giant; Inigo—the Spaniard whose steel thirsts for revenge; and Count Rugen—the evil mastermind behind it all. Foiling all their plans and jumping into their stories is Westley, Princess Buttercup’s one true love and a very good friend of a very dangerous pirate.

Review:

Even richer than the movie, which was pretty rich. And I adored Inigo and Fezzik. How could you not? But I’m a reader who doesn’t enjoy Historical Fiction as a genre because I can’t always tell what’s the Historical and what’s the Fiction. (Drives me nuts). So, the fact that the author/narrator essentially eradicates the third wall, obscuring where the fiction and the author/narrator’s supposedly real-life commentary split drove me up batty. (Yes, I realize it’s essentially all fiction, but the effect is the same.) What’s more I found it disruptive and not as endearing as I believe I was supposed to. But man, what a story.

How to piss off a book blogger, part III

Pissed Off

OK, I’m not really pissed off. That would be giving random people on the internet too much control over me and my emotional wellbeing. But seriously people, this is just RUDE and why exactly would I want to go out of my way to do a favor for a person who’s sole interaction with me and my blog is rude and dismissive? Can we say shooting yourself in the foot?

I’m talking, of course, about people who, not only can’t be bothered to read a blog’s policies before requesting a review, but don’t even bother to look; who don’t even bother with e-mail but jut pop a spammy comment in the comment section of another book’s review.

Here is an example. It was pulled from here.

Screen Shot 2015-06-07 at 1.26.09 PMThat is just so darned rude! But even Moon, above, did better than the one I received today.  He at least kept it brief and stuck to a review post, as opposed to a permanent page, like Mr. McMillian.

Screen Shot 2015-06-07 at 1.35.51 PM

He posted this as a comment on my permanent review page. As if I want this to be an everlasting fixture of the blog. At least Moon’s will get buried with each new post I write.

Yes, I could delete them, (In fact, see that red spam button in the image above? Yeah, that’s what I pressed for McMillian’s book.) but honestly I think they deserved to be shamed a little. No doubt these authors are as desperate for reviews as everyone else, but unless instructed to by the blogger, this is the 100% wrong way to request one. I don’t know a single blogger who would be happy with this. Plus, am I supposed to buy the book you’re spamming me to review? Because you can’t attach a file to a comment, so how is that supposed to even work?

It may not be a pubic service I’m providing by calling these guys (and others like them) out, but hopefully it will remind them to do better by the people they are soliciting for reviews. No one likes to waste time and believe me, this is a waste of time—mine and the author’s—because if the request is almost guaranteed not to result in a review, writing it is a waste of everyone’s time.

And it’s not just here that I find this sort of thing, though it’s my primary emphasis today. How about this one I received in a Goodreads friend request?

Screen Shot 2015-06-07 at 1.47.21 PM

I’ll let you guess if I accepted or not…no, of course I didn’t. I answered thus:

Screen Shot 2015-06-07 at 1.51.14 PM

I can at least give the man credit for being polite in his response, but get the real sense he still didn’t (maybe doesn’t) see the problem. The fact that it’s for charity in no way negates the fact that his solicitation was spam. (Nor does it excuse it.)

Sadie,
I appreciate your honesty and understand that my approach may irritate some.
But I’m trying hard, in my own little way, to help this island (Islay) that is losing population. Half of the book proceeds will support students of its high school on their mission trip to a third world country.
I don’t need the income from the book. It’s a giving-back sort of thing for me.
Hope you understand. Sorry to offend you.
Bob

I get it, you send out dozens of review requests and probably have a pretty poor response rate (everyone does) and it can be awful easy to forget that this is in fact a form of professional communication, even with hobby bloggers like myself. It can be easy to fall into an abbreviated, ‘I’ll just throw this one our just in case’ mentality. But let me assure you that, on the receiving end, we feel it and it does not reflect well on you or your book.

4767185000140321105919

I don’t need more than a sentence or two and a linked file in a request email. I don’t need flattery or press releases or extended synopses. It’s all nice, but I don’t think poorly of someone who doesn’t include it, so long as I have the basics. But I do need you to follow the direction, so that your book can travel the appropriate path to my reading list.

In my case, I track the emails. It’s how I list the books that have been sent to me for review requests. That means a blog comment doesn’t even make it onto the list. It simply doesn’t exist in the format I file requests in. So it is 100% ineffective and I would bet I’m not the only blogger with systems like this.

To bring this all around to the beginning though, I’m not even overly concerned at this point with effectiveness (because frankly, if you put so little effort into a request, I don’t care if it works or not) but with the flat out rudeness of it. This is rude and you just plain shouldn’t be rude to me if you want me to read your book.

Related posts:

How to piss off a book blogger, part I

How to piss off a book blogger, part II