Category Archives: Uncategorized

Review of C. J. Barry’s Unchained

UnchainedI grabbed a copy of C. J. Barry‘s Sci-fi Romance, Unchained from the Kindle free list.

Description from Goodreads:
Cidra Faulkner saw her family murdered and her people condemned for a crime they didn’t commit. Now a skilled Kin-Sha warrior, she vows to track down the true culprit and exact justice, both for her family and all the Kin-Sha. 

Intergalactic treasure hunter Grey Stone had no intention of helping Cidra until his old mentor tricked him into it. Now he’s trapped into helping the daughter of the man who brought about the downfall of his people — a woman whose very presence jeopardizes all he’s worked for. 

But honor won’t let him say no. And love won’t let him turn back.

Review: (slight spoilers)

This was an all right read…or at least I decided it was once I let go of any science fiction expectations and accepted that it’s really just a romance that happens to be set in space. It’s heavy on the sexual tension and light on…well, light on just about everything else. But it’s still an enjoyable read. Having said that, there were a number of points that really irked me.

For one, Cidra is said to be a well-trained Kin-sha practitioner (think some high level martial arts form). And though we do OCCASIONALLY see her use those skills to kick some butt, she is still very much a coddled, protected princess. The bent of the story is very much one in which the H wants to protect his h and in order to make this possible Cidra feels very fragile. As is so common in fiction, her ‘strength’ comes in the form of being willing to sacrifice herself for the good of others (in other words, her pure heart). How many times have I seen that trait in a heroine?

For another (and this is a personal pet peeve), the primary way that grey is described is as ‘primally male.’ Granted it was rephrased a few times, ‘masculine’ was used on occasion, etc. But the whole thing drove me to distraction, for a couple reasons. One, it’s a HORRIBLE way to describe a man as sexy. It infers that just by virtue of being male he is attractive to Cidra. I get that what the author is going for is that he possesses the attributes women find attractive in a man in abundance. I do get that, but it’s not actually what is said when the narrator says things along the line of:

He glided from position to position, purely, powerfully male. It called to her on a level she couldn’t explain.

Cidra gasped at his masculine power and hunger.

She pressed the length of her body to his, absorbing the fluid flow of male strength.

He was pure male muscle and strength.

What this actually does is separated the trait that is being male from the character and it alone is presented as attractive, not Grey himself. It’s dehumanising (just as it would be for women). At it’s most basic, it suggests that Cidra is attracted to a man (with no further description necessary to attract her). Is that really all we need here?

Second, if being a man is all it takes…or even extrapolating the argument out to include the appealing male attributes that calling him MALE (which how is should be said) is supposed to be relaying, Rourke or Bohr should be better candidates for Cidra’s attention. Both are bigger and more muscular…more masculine or MALE according to any circumstance in which MALENESS is enough to make someone sexy and attractive. Argg. Surely there are better adjectives out there!

For the most part, I thought that the writing was fine. There were a lot of really abrupt scene changes. The book could really do with some form of indication for this, heck even a line of asterisks would do. But I needed something to warn me, ‘hey, you’re leaving Grey and Cidra now and are gonna spend some time with Rourke and Decker.’

There were times that it was painfully predictable, however. This was mostly because the set up to some scenes was so readily apparent. Here’s an example: at one point Cidra and Grey travel to a very male-dominated planet to speak to a socially powerful man. Before Cidra even got off the ship I knew, just KNEW that at some point he (Bohr) would corner her and try to force himself on her. Not ten pages later, that’s exactly what happened.

I was further annoyed at this particular instance because it also presented an inconsistent cultural construct. Women were supposed to be severely oppressed and hold almost no rights. However, the woman Cidra meets isn’t at all cowed by her social situation as someone raised to believe herself a secondary citizen should be. Her (Sil’s) boldness didn’t fit the culture she was placed in. What’s more, there was supposed to be some sort of law empowering women whose mates weren’t faithful. Why would a über male-dominated culture that doesn’t believe in women’s rights or autonomy contradictorily provide them the legal means to castrate their husbands? Wouldn’t happen!

It was also incredibly repetitive about certain things, like Grey’s overpowering maleness. ‘Heat’ was another one. I realise these characters aren’t necessarily human, just humanoid. But Grey must run hot, ’cause his body heat seared Cidra in a hundred different ways. She felt is ‘wrap around her.’ His ‘masculine scent and body heat swept her senses.’ His ‘close proximity generating more heat than…’ ‘His big body wrapped around her, gilding her with his heat…’ She felt ‘the incredible heat of his arms.’ She could ‘feel his heat through the thin fabric…’ At one point heat even ‘roared through him like a supernova’ and he experienced ‘burning arousal.’ (I bet that’s painful.) I could go on. I stopped keeping track at about 50% and only started once I’d read enough to notice the repetition. But it’s the primary way that lust is expressed here.

It was only exacerbated by the way Grey’s virulence was highlighted by being described as barely contained (like fire?).  He came across as hardly able to control himself at all. He was always on the edge of snapping or unable to think or move on account of something he saw in/on Cidra. He even growled on occasion. He definitely came across as a bit of an ape-man and I don’t think he was supposed to.

Lastly, there’s a fairly massive coincidence at about 90% that was less than believable. It felt very contrived and convenient. It did however bring all of the characters together at last.

So, all in all, I had a lot of personal complaints. There were a lot of points that bothered me, even as I generally liked the characters themselves. But these points may not bother other people. As a piece of fluffy entertainment, it did the job. Oh, and it really is a stand-alone book. It ends!

vampire vacation

Book Review of Vampire Vacation, by C. J. Ellisson

Vampire VacationI picked up C. J. Ellisson‘s book, Vampire Vacation, from the KDP free list. It’s still free…probably perma-free.

Description from Goodreads:
Meet Vivian. She’s a 580-year-old vampire who exudes sex, has a talent for drama, and is passionate about two things: her human husband, Rafe, and their resort for the undead. Her ability to project physical illusions has created the perfect vacation spot-a dark, isolated Alaskan hideaway where visitors can have their wildest fantasies come true. 

Vivian knows the best performance requires perfect timing, but the powerful vamp is put to the test when she discovers a corpse in a locked guestroom minutes before the next arrivals. Always cool-headed, Rafe hides the body, convinced he and Vivian can find the culprit without disturbing their guests. Juggling the increasingly outrageous demands of their customers while tracking a killer isn’t easy. 

Will their poking and prodding give them the answers they need, or will it uncover secrets Vivian would kill to protect?

Review:
I moved this up my TBR after coming across a one-star Amazon review that was getting slammed with negative votes and derisive comments (198 at last count). I wanted to see what all the hubbub was about. (This, BTW, is a perfect example of a bad review gaining a book a reader. Just goes to show, bad reviews aren’t always bad for a book.)

My opinion? I wouldn’t call it one star worthy, but it’s not any great piece of literature either. Granted, it’s paranormal erotica, so who would expect great literature? But even for the genre it’s just fluff. Now, I enjoy a little fluff now and again. I do. So I’m not disparaging the book for this. But I will have to admit that it’s a pretty weak offering.

The problem is that the sex is too thick, even for an erotic book. At one point, the main characters have sex three separate times in a matter of hours. Now, given the time it takes to do the deed, cleanup (hopefully), redress and let the rubbery legs recuperate I have a hard time figuring out how they’re supposed to be getting anything else (like run an inn) done. Yes, I know it’s fantasy and I shouldn’t worry about the particulars, but i do.

That’s generally how the book felt. It was so cluttered with unnecessary and unrealistic sex (apparently no-one needs or expects foreplay, there isn’t any to be found) that the plot is forced to the side. I could almost see the poor thing trying to push itself to the surface on occasion, like a drowning victim in high seas. It would manage to peak out for a moment, only to be overcome by some ridiculous sexual foray, usually between Viv and Rafe but occasionally between a secondary character and Viv’s imagination. It was just a constant barrage on one sex-related activity, fantasy, comment, imagining, etc after another. The VV Inn felt very much like a bordello or a sex-retreat (do these have names?), but all of the guests felt too innocent to be there.

Then there is Viv, herself. I’m putting her in the too stupid to live category. She’s presented as if she’s unusually clever and strong, but she creates one ridiculous situation after another. Each time there is an excuse—I was so distracted by the blood I couldn’t think straight or I was so hopped up on werewolf blood I was distracted, etc—but after a while the excuses start to feel like just that, an excuse to cover her obvious lack of intelligence.

Though it was a bit heavy handed (we’re told about a million times how much they love/desire one another), I did appreciate the obvious affection between Viv and Rafe. It was nice to see a solid, loyal married couple with no desire to give in to the temptation to wander.

The writing itself was simplistic but fine, though names did crop up a bit too often to read smoothly. It’s in first person, present tense (which I HATE, hate, hate) but it’s not too badly edited and there aren’t too many cringe-worthy passages. All in all, it’s a little on the cheesed up side, Vivian being too focused on her own sexual prowess (teaching the guest SMBD, for example) to feel serious about much of anything else. She felt self-centred and conceited. I loved Rafe, Jon and Asa but not Viv, if I’m honest. If I found the rest of the series free, I’d read it. But I’m not racing out to put my money on the table for it.

Gravettian Goddess

Book Review: Gravettian Goddess, by B. Alexander Howerton

Gravettian GoddessAuthor, B. Alexander Howerton sent me an e-copy of his novel Gravettian Goddess. I’ve also seen it on the KDP free list.

Description from Goodreads:
What if the Holy Grail were real? What if people could truly live forever? Gravettian Goddess will appeal to fans of both The Da Vinci Code and Clan of the Cave Bear. It is the story of Greg Janeszco, a self-made internet multi-millionaire with a penchant for archaeology, who discovers a mystery that reaches back into the dim mist of prehistory, when humans first migrated into Europe at least 40,000 years ago during the ice age and created the wondrous cave paintings found there. Can he solve the ancient riddle before the pursuing members of a shadowy international organization, who want to exploit the find for their own dark purposes?

Review: ***spoiler alert***
This book has a truly interesting idea and, I think, an honorable aim. It should be stated up front that I appreciate that about it and the right reader will probably find a lot of worthwhile information and an interesting story here. This is important to state up-front, because I obviously was not the right reader. I intend to spend a page or so detailing, in excruciating detail, why not and I don’t want it to come across as an attack. I’m not pulling any punches, but I’m not trying to be mean.

I recognise and give credence to the fact that others love this book. I didn’t, which was surprising to me. I’d have thought this would be right up my alley. My first degree was anthropology, with minors in archaeology and religious studies. So, I obviously have an interest in the subject area. But no, despite being right in the middle of my interest grid, this book didn’t do it for me. It is possible that same educational history made much of this book redundant to me and affected my enjoyment of it, since there is A LOT of theory presented here in a rather academic mien.

The book begins with a number of solid and, frankly, annoying textbook-like info-dumps, broken up by a number of characters’ history info-dumps. In fact, I’d say the 1st 25% is pretty much ALL info-dumps, back to back. It got repetitive quickly. (However, I’ll acknowledge that if you know nothing about human evolution and migrations or the various cultures that revered the Mother Goddess, this might be riveting for you. It’s an interesting topic after all.)

Further, many of the historical info-dumps resulted from a convenient knowledge gap on Greg’s part. He’s a Ph.D. level student of archeology at a renowned school. Even if he did focus on underwater archaeology, much of what he needs explained to him (for the benefit of the reader) would be undergraduate anthropology 201 level stuff. He should know it and it felt artificial that he didn’t.

As the book progressed and the guise of a mystery was dropped all together, the info-dumps  morphed into actual lectures. I didn’t particularly enjoy this, nor did I find their flow particularly natural. As an example, Greg repeatedly attempted to interject humanist objections about the interpretations of pre-historic mythology. This simply came across as scripted attempts to pre-emptively counter some ethereal social arguments.

At one point he questioned if the Venus of Willendorf figure is actually just an early form of degrading sexism and objectification of women instead of a representation of the divine. It felt very much like he did this just so that Malenka could then lecture him on the dangers of assigning our value set to other cultures. This is an important anthropological lesson and true, but its inclusion at this point in the story (in a conversation between four anthropologists who shouldn’t need it in the first place) felt forced, as if part of some ulterior motive.

It’s this ulterior motive that really irked me in the end. The book is initially presented as a bit of a mystery. Comparisons to Dan Brown are made and the first couple chapters set it up to be of a similar sort of book. Then that mystery is dropped completely! In fact, both the man Greg is seeking and the woman who prompted him to action and joined him on the search die—no more action/adventure mystery. What’s left is Greg’s transformative experience with the Great Earth Goddess. This is the focus of the book!

All that mystery preamble feels like a bait and switch to get you into the lessons on the sacred feminine. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a fan of the Goddess, but I don’t like sneak proselytising from her followers any more than I do when the Jehovah witnesses knock on my door at 8:00 Saturday morning. I don’t know that the author meant the book to feel like this (or even if he’s an actual follower), but it did.

For the most part, I found the writing perfectly passable, but there were times that it fell apart. Names and endearments were used too frequently in dialogue to feel normal. Some descriptions were painfully over-detailed and there were a number of run-on, or extreme compound sentences. (Just read the first in the book for an example.)

While the technical writing was fine, the book is quite repetitive. The reader is told “Greg awoke,’ or some variation of it about 4,000 times. Similarly we’re given some form of  ‘an indeterminate amount of time passed’ another 4,000 times, or so. This was noticeable both in it’s repetition and because the information was often irrelevant. If Greg is off doing something, anything, he’s obviously woken up.

Additionally, both Dr. Tillmans, Zorian and Ellsington all teach in the exact same manner, by asking “are you sure’ whenever Greg regurgitates ‘common knowledge.’ It became an obvious ploy to force the reader to consider their own opinions on the matters in question and, hopefully, see the error of their ways. But seeing  four seperate people pulling the same schtick again and again didn’t feel believable. In fact, I got down right annoyed at it. It came across as incredibly arrogant. A number of the questions they highlight are worth consideration, however.

There was also very little character development. The bad guys are wholly evil, lacking any redeeming qualities (including basic sanity, apparently) while the good guys are saints. You’d think none of them even ever woke up grumpy. These extreme dichotomies were disconcerting. As was the fact that Greg, a 30-year-old American man, was a touchy-feeling, huggy, crier, who even fainted at one point. How many men do you know like that?

I generally like a little romance in a book, but here I don’t think it contributed to the story. If there had been a single strong connection, it might have. Instead, Greg meets and within a couple days falls in love with Eleni, judging by how he grieved for her when she died a week later. A few (conscious) days after that, he meets and immediately falls in love with Alaia. By dint of their mere replaceability, these relationships seem transient and unimportant, though they aren’t meant to. The time dedicated to shining eyes, swaying hips, blinding smiles, etc (not to mention sex) only distracted the reader amidst an already flagging plot. It didn’t have room for such detractions.

Lastly, I see from the previous reviews (and the author’s responses to them) that the book has taken a lot of flack for it’s/the character’s critical treatment of Dan Brown’s work (surprising since the author chose to site him as a comparable read). I highlighted a number of these passages without realising this. My issue, however, was not any kind of offence on Brown’s behalf or indignation at one author slamming another, more well-known author, in his work. No, mine was a much more personal complaint. I hate, HATE seeing these kinds of pop references in books (if pop reference if the right phrase for it).

When characters say things like, “Whoa, this is too much. It’s almost like we’re living through the Da Vinci Code or something,” no matter the source material, I groan. I just hate it. To me it only highlights the improbability of a plot by pointing out that it resembles a well know fictional account. Why would I want that? I want to FORGET that it’s fiction and impossible so that I can immerse myself in it. Totally personal, that, but still.

So, again, there is an interesting kernel of an idea here. It’s obvious that the author did a lot of research before writing the book. He ties a number of different cultures together in a considerable way.  Some people will no doubt enjoy the hell out of it. As for me…if you’re interested in the Goddess Cultures portrayed in this novel, I’d recommend skipping the attempt at fiction and just reading Baring & Cashford’s The Myth of the Goddess: Evolution of an Image.

…and that, my friends, is a 1,300-word review….